.......An insight to my life and what i feel...........

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Modi is back

So Modi is back, a bigger, stronger version of him I must add. It was a clean sweep, something that may be even BJP didn’t expect. I am no fan of Modi, but I was impressed by the way he carried out his campaign and went on to win the election. During the campaign there was an aura about him. The entire focus was Narendra Modi. The Gujarat election was all about one man. Like him or hate him, he was everywhere. Even after the “Merchants of Death” comment, Modi remained unperturbed. The allegation played in his hands and became stronger. Modi had a master plan for the campaign while Congress was clueless and disoriented. There were no local leaders being promoted. They were busy preparing the stage for the national leaders. Leaders like Solanki and Vaghela were forced to take backstage as people kept wondering who would become the chief minister in case they came to power. “Denial is a dangerous soporific.” And if the 2007 Gujarat assembly election results have shown anything beyond the obvious — the obvious being the overwhelming mandate given by the people of Gujarat to the performance of Chief Minister Narendra Modi — it is that the Congress has been yet again caught sleeping. Congress had little to speak beyond Modi bashing. At times they seemed to lose the plot completely, and sounded out of sync of their own words. The mandate of Gujarat was also a reflection of the dominance Modi has. Even without the support of BJP veteran Keshubhai Patel, and the RSS backing Modi managed a thumping majority, which left the Modi critics baffled.

Modi was a one man show in Gujarat. All other leaders of the BJP seemed irrelevant. He is a tremendous orator. The way he can swing the audience with his words is astounding. He gets the crowd emotional. Once emotional, the votes are already won. Because once your heart takes over, you are no longer in a position to think. This is where Modi hits hard. In his speeches he used one line often, “do you want Modi to be your leader? Then vote for BJP”. It was as if the local BJP candidate was a mere formality on the face of democracy. While Modi was swinging the votes to his favour the Congress filled the stage with people who could not even speak fluent Hindi leave alone Gujarati. Modi went on making claims of development (much of which was exaggerated) while no one was there to counter him. Modi played the right mix of hindutva and development. He made the right noises at the right places. It was a master at work.

What implications does this victory have at the national scene? Nothing significant. For BJP there are two noteworthy points. One it will give them a confidence and a much needed boost to an ailing party. Secondly, there is a headache in the name of Narendra Modi. Now that Modi has got the confidence of the entire Gujarat virtually, it means he can make more noises at the BJP Headquarters, something that old Advani would not want to hear. Congress has no worries at the national scene due to this loss. I have always believed Congress’ tactics are much suited at the national level, while they have not yet figured out how to win states. What Congress needs to correct is their failure in implementing the Common Minimum Programme and not their loss in Gujarat, the rest will fall in place. Personally, Mayawati sweeping UP elections is a bigger worry than Modi claiming Gujarat.

To sign off I would just like to add that Modi deserves all the accolades for the way he carried his campaign and returned to power with a thumping majority. But I wonder had Congress had a better plan may be we would have had a different result. May be this article would have sung praises for someone else.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Social Snobbery

There was a national outbreak of rage and anger when the news of the CEO of Orient Express claiming that a closer association with the Taj group could only spell a “reduction and erosion” of the brand value of his own hotels broke. I wished he tried booking a room at the Taj Mahal Hotel, Mumbai where a luxury suite sets you back by a hefty 3000$. It was considered the worst possible snub in the face of the growing corporate India which seems on a rampage, buying nearly every property on sale. Another news that stood out was the survey that stated that nearly two thirds of Indians have a higher opinion about our culture and our economy. It’s not exactly clear why, if we are such a self-confident people, we jump through hoops each time one of our own gets Corporate America’s approval. If we think we are better then it’s only natural that we will get a nod ahead of others. May be the reason lies in the underlying hypocrisies on the face of the growing India. We as a country are still battling with caste disparities and discrimination. When we discriminate and snub people for belonging to backward caste why do we expect a different behavior on the part of Americans? While we swagger with confidence as we fight for our rightful place in the new world order, how do we react to exactly the same conflict on home turf? We still see old politicians too feeble even to walk contest polls and a new energetic young leader get snubbed at the face and ruthlessly made to sit out. Same goes in Indian cricket. We still see our old warriors bite to dust but never is a newcomer promoted with the same exuberance and more often their activity is limited to just carrying towels and water bottles. Doesn’t the situation sound woefully similar? Why is Gautam Gambhir from Delhi given chance after chance while other people are fired at a single mistake?

I think India is still tormented by the worst form of social snobbery. Unless we confront our class prejudices we would be guilty of the same narrow mindedness that we have to face in the global arena. Just as the world can not put India under leash, we can not keep the rest of India confined within walls created by social differences.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

why can not two people from the opposite sex be friends

I could never have imagined a movie with a female friend of mine to be so simple. It was exactly two friends hanging out together like I have done millions of times now. This raised a very pertinent question in my mind, why cant two people of the opposite sex hang out like normal friends. For a few minutes I was conscious of the glaring glances of the people who presume something irrelevant. But then I realized they had nothing better to do.

When a guy walks up to a girl to talk it doesn’t mean that he is hitting on her. OK may be in most cases it is like that but you can not generalize and pass a judgment on him. People say great relationships are based on friendship. But we do forget that friends were also strangers at some point of time. Unless we intermingle more freely we will never be able to shatter such barriers that the society has built around us, which actually chokes us. Imagine a guy who has never talked to a girl in his life after marriage. He has no clue about how members of the opposite sex think, talk and react. And you throw him to an alien world and wish for a happy married life. Do you seriously think it will work? It may have worked when women were subdued and had no voice but in today’s age of women liberisation this isn’t the case. They have a voice and they are heard. People often complain that certain people do not know how to treat women but excuse me did they ever get a chance to get to know to how to treat them. For them all strangers are alike so a behavior shown towards a male and a female are exactly the same. But for us they are perfectly normal for males but extremely derogatory for females.

We have to rethink the why we handle our society. Unless we create an environment in which the two sexes can freely interact and be friends I am afraid the future seems darker. Such an atmosphere is prevalent to certain degree in the metros but in the suburbs let alone the rural India situation is still bleak. But even n metros we can not say that it is a fully tolerant society. We can not tell our parents about a new friend that we have made for some obvious reasons. To hide one truth we create a mountain of lies and finally the parent loses faith on their children. But we never hide a male friend from our parents. Why can not we be just ourselves like we are with our other friends? If somebody wishes to make a difference he is termed a playboy. Something for us to ponder……………

Powered By Blogger